Current:Home > ContactExxon Relents, Wipes Oil Sands Reserves From Its Books -TrueNorth Capital Hub
Exxon Relents, Wipes Oil Sands Reserves From Its Books
SafeX Pro View
Date:2025-04-06 08:57:15
ExxonMobil announced Wednesday that it had wiped off its books all 3.5 billion barrels of tar sands oil reserves at one of its projects in Canada. Because of recent low oil prices, the company said none of those reserves can be considered economical according to the accounting rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The accounting change at its Kearl project, a momentous if expected development, represented a turnaround for the company, which has long resisted calls to revise its reserves estimates. Over the past decade, Exxon had steadily increased its holdings in Canada’s tar sands to become a leading producer there.
Exxon also removed from its books 800 million barrels of oil-equivalent reserves in North America, though the reductions were offset by the addition of 1 billion barrels of oil and gas elsewhere.
Exxon said in October that low prices would likely force it to “de-book” up to 4.6 billion barrels of reserves in its end-of-year accounting. Securities and Exchange Commission rules allow oil companies to count reserves only if they are profitable based on average prices over the previous year.
But while the accounting change removes billions of dollars worth of tar sands investments from the company’s annual report, and is watched closely by investors, it will not directly affect operations. Exxon plans to continue operating its Kearl project, and said it will add back the reserves if oil prices rise or costs drop. After the reduction, the company now reports holding 1.3 billion barrels of tar sands reserves.
Exxon will hold an analyst meeting on March 1.
Earlier this week, ConocoPhillips said it had reduced its oil sands reserves by more than 1 billion barrels, bringing its total to 1.2 billion for 2016. These moves had been expected, as low oil prices have placed a heavy burden on tar sands projects, which are among the most expensive and polluting sources of oil.
veryGood! (35)
Related
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- Inside Clean Energy: Think Solar Panels Don’t Work in Snow? New Research Says Otherwise
- A Plan To Share the Pain of Water Scarcity Divides Farmers in This Rural Nevada Community
- Reddit CEO Steve Huffman: 'It's time we grow up and behave like an adult company'
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- A Court Blocks Oil Exploration and Underwater Seismic Testing Off South Africa’s ‘Wild Coast’
- Kate Middleton and Prince William Show Rare PDA at Polo Match
- Sony and Marvel and the Amazing Spider-Man Films Rights Saga
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- Duke Energy Is Leaking a Potent Climate-Warming Gas at More Than Five Times the Rate of Other Utilities
Ranking
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Drugmaker Mallinckrodt may renege on $1.7 billion opioid settlement
- It's National Tequila Day 2023: See deals, recipes and drinks to try
- Toxic Metals Entered Soil From Pittsburgh Steel-Industry Emissions, Study Says
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Logan Paul and Nina Agdal Are Engaged: Inside Their Road to Romance
- California Has Provided Incentives for Methane Capture at Dairies, but the Program May Have ‘Unintended Consequences’
- Duke Energy Is Leaking a Potent Climate-Warming Gas at More Than Five Times the Rate of Other Utilities
Recommendation
Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
Feel Cool This Summer in a Lightweight Romper That’s Chic and Comfy With 1,700+ 5-Star Amazon Reviews
YouTubers Shane Dawson and Ryland Adams Expecting Twins Via Surrogate
Inside Clean Energy: US Battery Storage Soared in 2021, Including These Three Monster Projects
Small twin
Untangling John Mayer's Surprising Dating History
Unions are relieved as the Supreme Court leaves the right to strike intact
Ex-Starbucks manager awarded $25.6 million in case tied to arrests of 2 Black men